The Hot
Shower.org
The ER card

The card for the worst night.

When you can't get the words out, this can. It states your history plainly, names the one sign that raises suspicion of CHS without pretending it confirms anything, and asks the clinician to keep looking. Print it and you get the short version, sized for a wallet. Everything that wouldn't fit on two sides of card stock, the full differential, the medication evidence, and links to real hospital pathways, lives on this page and behind the QR code on the back.

One dataset found patients averaged 17.9 emergency visits and $76,920.92 in combined emergency and imaging costs before they were diagnosed (Zimmer et al. 2019). This card exists to bring that number down, not to replace the workup that gets someone there faster.

Printed a card before 31 July 2026? Print a new one.

This page was revised on 31 July 2026. The version before it reported the wrong figure for a key trial and carried no differential list for the clinician to check against. Every card below now carries a small version stamp, v2026.07.31, on both faces. If the card in your wallet is missing one, or shows an earlier date, it's out of date. Print a new one and throw the old one away.

See the full evidence
01
Print it
Print this page. The two card faces come out wallet sized. Cut them out, put them back to back.
02
Or save it
On your phone, screenshot both cards below and keep them in a favorites album. No printer needed.
03
Hand it over
At triage, give it to the nurse. Fill in your name and a contact so they know who you are.
Front · what you tell them
I may have Cannabinoid
Hyperemesis Syndrome
ICD-10-CM R11.16
v2026.07.31

I'm a long term, heavy cannabis user with cyclic vomiting. Hot water usually helps, which raises the chance of CHS but doesn't confirm it.

Please still evaluate me for other causes of vomiting. I'm not asking you to assume CHS. See the back for what to keep ruling out.
Name
DOB
Emergency contact
Back · for the clinician
Reference, not a request
R11.16
v2026.07.31
  • Ondansetron is usual care, helps about a third. Its authors found a failed dose should not be repeated or increased.
  • GRACE-4 (2024): haloperidol or droperidol added to usual care, low certainty evidence. Check potassium and ECG first; correct K+ under 3 mEq/L.
  • Opioids are advised against, per Hopkins and the AGA.
  • Diagnosis of exclusion. Please continue to rule out other causes, for example bowel obstruction, pancreatitis, DKA and pregnancy. Full differential at the QR.
Ruberto 2021 (HaVOC, 31% vs 59%, CI crosses zero) · GRACE-4 2024 · Hopkins pathway 2025 · Zimmer 2019. Differential and sources at the QR.
the evidence

Why it's written this way

A card that named a specific drug could make a busy team anchor on CHS and miss something else, especially before anyone has checked a potassium or run an ECG. This one does the opposite. It cites the trials, notes what's uncertain, including the fact that hot water relief raises the chance of CHS without confirming it, and defers every choice to the clinician in front of you. It helps a doctor do the job. It doesn't try to do it for them.

On a phone? Screenshot both cards above and keep them somewhere fast to find. Either way, the QR on the back opens the full evidence, the complete differential, and the hospital pathways this card is built from, so a curious clinician can check everything for themselves.

What follows didn't fit on the card. It's the long version, and it's what the QR on the back links to: the trial number read exactly as published, the full list of what to keep ruling out, the medication evidence in more detail, and the hospital pathways themselves.

The trial, read exactly as published

HaVOC compared haloperidol against ondansetron in adults with CHS, in a crossover design. In the first treatment period, 4 of 13 patients (31%) on haloperidol needed rescue antiemetics, compared with 10 of 17 (59%) on ondansetron. Ruberto AJ et al., Ann Emerg Med 2021;77(6):613 to 619.

Honesty note

The difference was -28 percentage points, with a 95% confidence interval that ran from -61% to 13%. That interval crosses zero, which means the trial cannot rule out no difference at all. A card that reported this result without the interval would be overselling it, and a doctor reading it would know. Read how this number was checked.

Please continue to exclude

CHS is a diagnosis of exclusion. There's no confirmatory test and no validated criteria, and the proposed criteria have not been externally validated at the bedside (Rotella et al. 2022). Here's what the literature says to keep checking for, and the tell for each one.

Retching itself can injure. Watch for an oesophageal tear, and for spontaneous pneumomediastinum, which has been reported with no chest pain at all (Patel and Lippert, 2025).

Honesty note

No one has published a case series of patients harmed by a missed diagnosis here. This list is a differential to check against, not a record of documented failures, and it should be read that way. Equally, no one has measured how often a CHS diagnosis gets revised later, or whether the exclusion workup happens at all. Both absences are findings, not reassurance.

The medicines, as evidence, not orders

Ondansetron is usual care in every guideline this card cites, and it helps roughly a third of patients. HaVOC's own authors concluded that standard dose ondansetron "should no longer be used as the first line agent to abort emesis" in CHS, because repeating a dose that already failed rarely helps.

GRACE-4, the emergency medicine guideline built for this exact presentation, conditionally recommends haloperidol or droperidol added to usual care, on very low certainty evidence. The Johns Hopkins All Children's pathway asks for a basic metabolic panel and an ECG before IV haloperidol, and for potassium under 3 mEq/L to be corrected first, because prolonged vomiting depletes potassium, low potassium prolongs the QT interval, and both drugs prolong it further. Two independent published CHS sources show how far this can run: QTc readings from 477 to 566 ms alongside potassium of 2.7 and 3.3 (Kwag et al. 2022), and a QTc of 528 ms alongside potassium of 3.0 (Merino et al. 2025). Children's Minnesota's action points: a QTc above 460 ms in males or 480 ms in females calls for a repeat ECG within two weeks, and above 500 ms calls for a cardiology consult.

Droperidol's 2001 black box warning rests on adverse event reports concentrated at doses well above what emergency departments use for CHS. Only nine torsades cases have been attributed to droperidol across three decades, at any dose. Children's Minnesota still recommends an ECG before a repeat dose.

Topical capsaicin is conditionally recommended, on the strength of one underpowered 30 patient pilot trial (Dean et al. 2020). The Hopkins pathway states plainly that it hasn't been shown to reduce abdominal pain, and describes it as a vasodilator, not a painkiller. Combining it with hot water raises the risk of a burn.

Fluids: D5 normal saline with 20 mEq of potassium chloride per liter, at 1 to 1.5 times maintenance (Hopkins, Children's Minnesota).

Opioids are advised against, by both the Hopkins pathway and the AGA's 2024 update.

Longer term, the AGA's 2024 update names amitriptyline, at a minimal effective dose of 75 to 100 mg at bedtime, alongside cessation counselling. That recommendation is largely borrowed from cyclic vomiting syndrome, and hasn't been proven in CHS specifically.

Four pathways from hospitals that already treat this

A link to a peer institution's own published pathway is worth more than anything a patient can say. Here they are, exactly as the clinicians who wrote them use them.

Full citations for every number on this page are on the evidence page, and the way they were checked is written up on how this was made.

I'm in an episode right now